Land-owning businesses like Weyerhaeuser are limited in the Global South. Most of the land here is fragmented among many smallholder and medium-holder farmers who are exposed to both climate shocks and market shocks. Aggregation into farmer cooperatives have been promoted by various governments to improve market resilience, primarily to improve purchasing efficiency (from suppliers) and negotiating power (with buyers).

These aggregators, or an enterprise layer that can aggregate cooperatives through joint ventures, can have the scale to attract commercial capital. Cafe Selva Norte (CSN) is an example worth studying.

CSN is a vertically integrated landscape platform, functioning at the “enterprise layer” sitting between investors and FPOs/cooperatives. It can be described as a joint venture, established in Peru in 2018, that came into prominence after an investment by the Land Degradation Neutrality Fund. It is a joint venture between four local coffee cooperatives and URAPI (the Canadian impact fund managed by Ecotierra Capital, the GPs) with Ecotierra Project Management as the operator bringing the sustainability alignment expertise and ElevaFinca as the sales arm, facing coffee buyers and carbon credit buyers.

The problem

CSN is attacking a combined agronomic, financial, and environmental problem in northern Peru. Smallholder coffee is structurally under‑capitalized and ecologically degraded, with no mechanism to monetize restoration and forest protection. The region has degraded, ageing coffee plantations with low yields and poor quality, largely because farmers lacked capital and technical support to renovate and manage agroforestry systems. There is limited processing infrastructure and traceability, which traps cooperatives in low‑margin, bulk markets and weakens their bargaining power. Ongoing forest degradation and climate risk threaten long‑term productivity and livelihoods, but are not priced or financed in conventional coffee systems.

Cafe Selva Norte’s solution

CSN bundles three key interventions:

1. Agroforestry renovation finance tackles low yields and ageing trees while embedding agroforestry from the start.
   • Via URAPI financing, the asset management company Ecotierra Capital provides loans to coffee cooperatives under CSN, which on‑lend micro‑credit to smallholders to renovate ageing farms and establish productive coffee‑agroforestry systems (new coffee plants + shade trees). Loan terms and repayment structure are part of the revenue model.
   • ECOTIERRA Project Management delivers technical assistance to cooperatives and farmers, funded partly by LDN Technical Assistance Facility (TAF) and other grants. The grant model reduces stress on operating costs from revenues.
   • The MINKA database stores farm maps, varieties, production history, tree density, and VCS monitoring data, used for both relationship management and MRV.
     
2. Processing plant equity and quality upgrade
   • Café Selva Norte plant owns the coffee processing plant to improve quality, traceability, and efficiency for the region’s cooperatives. The plant has part equity ownership from the main investors. This gives cooperatives access to higher‑quality processing and a stronger commercialization hub, addressing the infrastructure and traceability gap. Coffee sales the major and recurrent revenue stream, requiring limited MRV compared to the carbon revenue stream.
     
3. Forest protection and restoration projects
   • CSN has a share from the revenues of the VCS‑certified forest protection and restoration, aiming to protect about 200,000 ha of forest and restore 8,250 ha of degraded land, generating carbon revenues. This directly addresses deforestation and climate risk while creating a new revenue stream of carbon, linked to carbon markets. This is directly under Ecotierra Project Management.

It’s own market

This is not a “global coffee market” bet; it’s a regional agroforestry + forest‑protection platform. So the “market” here is: a material slice of Peru’s northern coffee landscape and a multi‑million‑tonne NbS carbon project, all inside a USD 15m project within a USD 50m land‑use fund.

The revenue model

Café Selva Norte’s revenues come from four main sources:

1. Coffee sales
   • Sale of higher‑quality, traceable, sometimes certified coffee processed at the plant.
   • Cooperatives benefit from better pricing; the plant earns processing margins and potentially trading margin.
2. Processing and commercialisation services
   • The plant provides processing services to cooperatives and may earn fees/margins on marketing and sales, e.g., cupping, quality differentiation, traceability, and export handling.
3. Timber and wood products
   • Over the long-term, timber from agroforestry systems adds a supplementary revenue stream (less immediate but relevant for IRR over 15 years).
4. Carbon credits
   • VCS‑certified project for agroforestry, forest restoration, and forest protection generates carbon credits sold to external buyers.

The target is to combine revenue streams and deliver roughly a 12% overall return to URAPI’s investors at fund level.

An interesting, typical blended capital stack

Above the project level, URAPI Sustainable Land Use Fund is a closed‑end fund that invests in multiple projects; it raised $50M in equity from institutional investors, foundations, and the LDN Fund. URAPI has committed $15M to Café Selva Norte, with a 15‑year investment term.

Within Café Selva Norte, capital structure is a mix of:

• Equity: into the processing plant and forest carbon projects.
• Debt: 15‑year loans to cooperatives (and possibly SPVs), which on‑lend to farmers.
• Grants: technical assistance grants from LDN‑TAF and others, which reduce risk but are not part of commercial capital.

This combination of equity, long‑tenor debt, and TA grants is typical of blended finance for NbS. Defensibility is more execution and relationship‑based: it rests on co‑op relationships, long‑term capital, and data‑backed MRV and marketing, which are hard to replicate quickly.

Why agribusiness PE can come in

CSN demonstrates what a viable NbS capital structure looks like when land ownership is fragmented: an enterprise layer that aggregates cooperatives, controls processing infrastructure, and generates revenue across coffee sales, processing margins, and carbon credits. The investable unit is the platform.

Layer	Commercial instrument	Why PE would like it
Mill / processing plant	Asset-backed debt or structured term loan	Tangible collateral and predictable throughput.
Trade finance	Revolving working-capital facility	Matches harvest cycles and inventory turns.
Supplier finance	Receivables / pre-export finance	Ties capital to contracted coffee flows.
Platform equity	Growth equity or control equity	Captures processing, origination, and commercialization margin.
Carbon project	Separate project-finance or royalty strip	Upside without contaminating the core underwriting.

The question is whether this architecture requires impact-specialist capital to function, or whether it describes something commercial PE can underwrite. The core commercial structure is what will attract PE: equity ownership in processing infrastructure, contracted offtake from cooperatives, quality and traceability systems that command premium pricing, and carbon credits as a performance-linked top-up on a cashflow that already works without them.

This is a structure agribusiness PE can read. The revenue streams are not exotic. The holding period requirement is long, but not unusual for agribusiness PE with existing commodity relationships and operational infrastructure already in-market compared to climate VC with <10 year return profiles. Processing margin is conventional, and the traceable offtake with named cooperative counterparties is bankable. Certification premiums are already priced into specialty commodity markets. Carbon revenue adds IRR without changing the investment thesis.

The disaggregated land ownership that makes direct acquisition impossible in most of the Global South stops being a problem at the enterprise layer. The cooperatives handle aggregation. The lending facility of the CSN model can rest within the cooperatives, supporting its farmer shareholders. The platform handles processing, traceability, and compliance. The investor holds equity in the layer that captures margin.

CSN’s current structure leans on a 15-year fund horizon, concessional TA grants, and DFI participation to reach its ~12% target return. Without those, the return profile softens. But that is a capital stack problem, not a structural one. The enterprise layer itself — commodity cashflows anchored by named offtake, processing assets with tangible equity value, carbon as a performance-linked top-up — is worth PE consideration across the Global South.

---

This article builds on my premise of land-owning businesses adopting NbS as a strategic operating layer, described in the previous article.