Live and let live, or live and let die?

We’ve seen what happens when species is lost from an ecosystem. Actually, we are continuing to see this happening in pretty much every ecosystem on the planet. Loss of biodiversity is not an issue that is alien to us (certainly not alien to the readers of this blog). I’ve gone into this in greater detail in Earth’s Paradox: Greater complexity, more stability, which you can take a look at.

But what happens when we add extra species into an ecosystem? Does that even happen? It happens more often than you think. As a consequence of our “messing around” with nature, we inadvertently introduce a lot of new species into the ecosystem. They are called alien species. These species can get invasive and destroy the biodiversity of the area; then they become invasive species. But what if they aren’t “invasive”? Will they have a significant affect on the ecosystem?

Let’s find out…

Insertion of species: Competition or coexistence?

The insertion of new species can have multiple effects. This depends on two factors: interspecific and intraspecific competition. Interspecific competition is between the two different species present in the ecosystem. Intraspecific competition is the competition between individuals of the same species.

For example, if humans invaded a forest and established agricultural land, the competition for resources between elephants and humans will be interspecific. This is also called contest. The competition for resources among different families in the human settlement will be intraspecific (the competition between individual elephants is also intraspecific). This is called scramble.

Depending on the dynamics of these two factors, three conditions will arise.

Interspecific > Intraspecific

In this condition, there is greater competition between the two species than within the species. From the above example, the elephants and humans are competing with each other rather than amongst themselves for resources (interestingly, the entire plot for Planet of the Apes is based on this phenomenon). In such situations, one of the species is completely removed and the other survives. Generally, the species that started out with a greater population tends to survive such competition.

intra

(I explained this phenomenon through the concept of hypervolume niches in a previous blog.)

Interspecific < Intraspecific

Here, there is a dominance of scramble. The humans are too busy fighting for land among themselves to worry about elephants, and the elephants seem to be doing the same thing. An interesting outcome arises because of this. Due to such high competition within a species, neither species is able to attain maximum population density in the ecosystem. Their need for resources, therefore, which be much less. This will allow both species to coexist. 

intra

Often, this situation leads to resource partitioning, which is also something I explained in the hypervolume niche blog (click on the link above).

Interspecific ~ Intraspecific

In this situation, there is a pretty much equal level of competition between species and within species. So, the humans continue to fight for larger chucks of land and resources, but also recognize the presence of elephants in the area. They also do not want the elephants to have the resources.

This is the most common situation that is found in real life ecosystems, especially when humans are one of the interacting species. What do you think this results in?

intra

It results in the complete obliteration of one species, while the other triumphs. The one that triumphs and survives is the fitter species of the two. In human-animal interactions, obviously it is the humans who come out on top.

Why is it important to understand these relationships?

Humans have caused insertion of many species in ecosystems around the world. Often, they are themselves the invasive species. Understanding the competition dynamics helps us mitigate them better. 

Wherever humans are involved, the competition generally results in long-term human-wildlife conflicts. Understanding competition dynamics helps us manage and conserve animal populations by deciding on the right mitigation measures.

Competition and the survival of the fittest organism is the reason we see the organisms around us. However, today the competition has arisen due to a lot of artificial influences, that is not only reducing species diversity but also decreasing heterogeneity in the ecosystems. This is a major cause of concern; therefore it should be studied and mitigated.

Advertisements

One thought on “Live and let live, or live and let die?”

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s