Diversity at different scales

Scale is absolutely critical in ecological studies. Everything, and I mean everything, depends on the scale at which it is defined. The is true for species diversity as well. Diversity of species (sometimes communities) in a landscape is generally observed in three different scales.

Image results for alpha beta gamma diversity

Alpha diversity

This is the diversity within a community at a particular site. When we casually speak of diversity in an area, more often than not it refers to alpha diversity. This diversity is on a small scale, generally of the size of one ecosystem.

Beta diversity

This is the diversity of species between two communities (or ecosystems). It is at a larger scale, and looks to compare the diversity between two separate entities that are often divided by a clear geographical barrier like a river or a mountain ridge.

Gamma diversity

This is a very large scale, where diversity is compared between many ecosystems, at the level of a biome. It could range over areas like the entire slope of a mountain, the entire littoral zone of a sea shore etc.

Let me put this into perspective with the help of an example. Let’s take a mountain slope as our landscape. On this slope, there will be many different patches of forests and grasslands. The diversity of species present in each of these patches represent it’s alpha diversity. The diversity between any two of these patches; becomes the beta diversity amongst those communities. The diversity of species along the entire range of the mountain slope will be the gamma diversity of that landscape. 


Why is this important?

Image results for alpha beta gamma diversity

In the context of human-land use, increasing fragmentation and climate change, monitoring and preserving biodiversity is of extreme importance. But diversity cannot just be protected; we need to be able to delineate proper areas and specifically work to improve that area’s diversity. It is basically because we have messed with diversity at one (or two) levels that the overall gamma diversity of the world is in decline today.

Habitat fragmentation is especially a big culprit when it comes to biodiversity loss. In a previous post on patch size and connectivity, I stressed on the positive relationship between size of the patch and the species it hosts. As smaller patches are created due to human needs, the diversity within these patches (along with numbers) is falling. How many species do you think can survive in a small habitat that is growing smaller and smaller?

Conversely, the patches are being increasingly separated from each other. This is is causing less and less interaction between adjacent communities. Due to less interaction, it is highly possible that the beta diversity is increasing in such landscapes. Beta diversity can also decrease, when human land-use is causing the generation of a homogeneous landscape (you can read more on human effect on landscape heterogeneity here). It could also be that geographical barriers like a road or a strip of dry land is preventing movement of species between two communities. This could, again, increase beta-diversity. The behavior of beta-diversity is highly unpredictable (which is not necessarily good).

Gamma diversity, on the other hand, has been showing a declining trend all over the world. Even if alpha diversity has remained constant or marginally decreasing, and even if beta-diversity is fluctuation, mass extinction in places all over the world is clear evidence for decreasing gamma diversity.

Conservation and restoration

Both, conservation and restoration methods need to take into account these separate parameters. It is important to first determine the scale at which these efforts are being pursued, and accordingly plan and implement projects. For example, if beta diversity needs to be controlled in between communities separated by a large corridor, the restoration should first mimic characteristics of both communities. This will then, allow free movement of species among these two communities. We will see an overall increase in alpha diversity, stabilization of beta diversity and recovery of gamma diversity.*


*This is a hypothetical situation. Many other factors need to be considered in such restoration and conservation projects, like the climate, location, species composition etc.


2 thoughts on “Diversity at different scales”

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s