Landscape ecology has evolved specifically because of certain phenomena that are unique to the big scale. One such phenomenon is the variation of vegetation along a gradient. This gradation is central to the vegetation continuum concept, which seeks to explain that presence or absence of a species in an area has as much to do with the environment as much as it has to do with its relationship with other species.
Vegetation continuum concept
This was proposed and worked upon by Whittaker and Curtis in the 1950’s. As opposed to the individualistic concept that prevailed at that time, which said the a species is found in an area independent of other species, vegetation continuum believed that species are present because of their relationship with other species and also with the environment.
These two scientists came to the conclusion that in most landscapes, environmental factors like temperature, elevation, pH, CO2, etc. do not change sharply. Instead, they gradually shift from one value to another; thus forming a gradient. Along this gradient, even vegetation changes gradually, and does not have sharp boundaries.
They termed this “vegetational gradient” that ran parallel to environmental gradient as ecocline.
For example, let us take an elevation gradient. If we were to go up the side of a mountain, the elevation gradually increases. Along with this, there is a corresponding change in the vegetational composition (and as a consequence, the animal life as well).
Why is this significant?
Over a landscape, it explains what determines the species composition. I explained the Climax-Hypothesis concept of climax in an earlier post. This theory also was tried to validate the presence of multiple climax communities based on different environmental gradients over space (it was also proposed by Whittaker, so no surprise there).
When you put together multiple environmental gradients over any landscape, be it a mountain slope, an alluvial plain or a forest, all of them together determine the environmental conditions that an organism will have to tolerate. This forms one-half of what an organism needs to adapt to. The other half comes from the responses of different organisms to the same environment, thus creating a thriving community.
If along a desert landscape, a rodent decided that because of the present environment gradient of temperature, it prefers to stay burrowed during the day. This will force the rodent’s predator to also alter its activities during the day, so that it can hunt in the night. This is just an idealized example, taking into consideration one gradient. But you can see how, with multiple gradients, the habits of a population or even a community could be dictated. Eventually, it is what determines the composition of the community.
Can this be studied?
Absolutely. In fact, this concept has gained popularity because it has been validated by ecological studies along a gradient. Such studies are called gradient analysis. Among other things, a gradient analysis can also involve the study of species diversity across a landscape, by considering alpha, beta and gamma diversity, about which I have written earlier. It is central to ecological studies that seek to understand changing community compositions.
Today, this field is of special interest because of the landscape effect of climate change. Gradient studies are conducted and modeled to understand how specific climactic factors are affecting community composition along a gradient. It is also used to assess distribution of species along these gradients.